Watch a trailer
Updates by Month
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- February 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
Radiology Registrar Survey 2017
Created - 24.11.2017
Response to Radiology Registrar Survey
During the month of October 2017 we conducted a survey to try and understand the reasons radiology trainees were not interested in interventional radiology. After attending such a great BSIR meeting in Birmingham, it is difficult to comprehend why anyone would want to do something else. Having said that, the results are interesting.
171 trainees responded, the majority (89) were trained in the UK. The split of male to females was 55%: 43%, with a few declining to comment. 62 % had done other specialities before entering radiology; 45% medicine, 56% surgery and 3.5% general practice.
17% expressed an interest in Interventional Radiology. 7% were interested in Interventional neuroradiology and 29 % were still undecided. The general split in other specialist areas (only most popular illustrated):
9 % were interested in general and non-vascular interventional radiology.
The main reasons for NOT considering Interventional Radiology:
- 59 % - Poor work life balance
- 58 % - Unsociable hours of work
- 44 % - Insufficient interest
- 22 % - Lack of opportunities for flexible/part time working
- 15 % - Lack of previous experience of working in IR (to inform choice)
- 9 % - Lack of role models
- 6 % - Extra year of study
- 6 % - Perceived risk
Interestingly the main reasons which influenced decision was unsociable hours (25%) and lack of previous experience in interventional radiology (25%).
If we look at just one common reason for not choosing IR, 'Unsociable hours of work' was reported as a 'key reason' for not considering a career in interventional radiology by 58% of respondents. A further 25% reported this as an influencing factor. Gender differences: Males more likely (M 73% vs F49%) to report this as a 'key reason’. The numbers are as illustrated. The standard response I often hear that women go into radiology as a lifestyle choice may not be applicable.
How important are these factors when considering a specialist interest or subspecialty:
- Extremely important or very important:
- Interest 94%
- Skills 83%
- Lifestyle 62%
- Level of innovation 52%
- On call intensity 39%
- Geography 33%
- Previous experience 39%
- Research opportunities 22%
- Private practice 22%
- Patient contact 33%
I think this survey has produced some interesting results. Certainly it has made me consider how much training/exposure to interventional radiology trainees get in their first 3 years. I appreciate there are many demands on a registrars time and the first 3 years can be very much focused on passing exams. However I do think these years are important regarding future career choices. I would feel more comfortable if trainees were not going into IR because they had made an informed choice. I sometimes think that my diagnostic colleagues do have a hand in putting trainees off, citing lifestyle, onerous hours etc. I also believe that we are partly to blame with a culture where we thrive on being the last one in the department. Interventional radiology is a victim of it’s own success resulting in ever increasing demands on our time. Anne Carson described ‘The Consultant Contract: Present and Future’ and the discussions after (Wednesday 2nd Nov at the BSIR) highlighted that it is time to take responsibility for our working hours and to sort out our rotas so they are sustainable long term. Interesting talks from Dr Ian Robertson on ‘Work-Life Balance’ and Jane Phillips-Hughes on ‘The Challenges of On-Call’ gave further food for thought.
These talks should be available on the BSIR website. I would encourage members to comment. We now have a member’s only forum and would very much welcome peoples thoughts.
Hilary White